Archive for the ‘linkdump’ Category

What I’m reading ed. 100705

Monday, July 5th, 2010

Moving and being in a wedding take up lots of time. Next update will have real content. Promise!

 

Things in the news: World Cup! Kagan, McChrystal, BP Oil Spill (slowly fading), Economic falterings, July 4th, and did I mention the World Cup? (Oh, I suppose Wimbledon as well. And the Tour de France. And the Lebron James Sweepstakes.)

 

Here’s your top 5

  1. The Renegade General (McChrystal)(RollingStone)
  2. Kagan hearing write-ups.
  3. Who’s a scientist? 7th graders describe and draw scientists after a visit to Fermilab
  4. James Sturm is quitting the internet
  5. Life inside the North Korean bubble (BBC + video, 15 min, worth watching)

 

(more…)

What I’m reading ed. 100617

Thursday, June 17th, 2010

You know the drill –

 

Topics in the news: Israel, Gaza, BP, World Cup, Kyrgyzstan, Afghanistan

 

Must reads over the past two weeks

  1. Countdown to the BP disaster (GQ)
  2. What if political scientists wrote the news? (Salon)
  3. Science Funding: The “Broader Impacts” requirement (Nature)
  4. Solitude and Leadership (delivered at West Point)
  5. What is Israel blockading, really? (graphic, analysis)

And…one for fun BP coffee spill.

 

(more…)

Things I’m reading ed. 100531

Monday, May 31st, 2010

Happy(?) Memorial Day, everybody. Lots of long articles worth reading this time, but you’ve got the rest of the night off, right? Big news is the BP Oil Spill and the failure of Top Kill. Will the leak ever end?

&nbsp

Top 5

  1. The inside story on how health care reform got enacted (Cohn)
  2. Obama vs Wall Street (NYMag)
  3. The Race to the Top: Education Reform and Teachers Unions (NYT)
  4. Video from 25 feet below the oil slick. (abc)
  5. Saving the Rust Belt (Reason)

 

(more…)

What I’m reading ed. 100523

Sunday, May 23rd, 2010

The BP Disaster is mindboggling. Also in the news: Britain’s elections, the Iran nuclear non-deal and sanctions, Greece, Elena Kagan, Thailand, FinReg, Carbon cap ‘n trade, Rand Paul, Arizona’s Illegal Immigration Law.

The Top 5:

(more…)

What I’m reading ed. 100412

Monday, April 12th, 2010

Nowhere near as comprehensive as my previous endeavours, but hopefully there’s enough to keep you interested and entertained.

  1. Whoops, maybe flooding the developing world with cheap US agriculture wasn’t so smart after all.
  2. Selections from Best Science Writing on the Blogs 2009: I recommend Cosmopithecus and Bittersweet.
  3. The Art of the Brick (Art Gallery)
  4. Mashed-up Culture (NYT)
  5. Inspiring: 2010 Winter Paralympics (Photos)

(more…)

RSS is ruining my life

Monday, March 22nd, 2010

As you may have noticed, about half the posts on this site are of the “linkdump” variety, where I aggregate all of the cool things that I’ve stumbled upon on the web throughout the past week or two into one massively long, link-filled post. There is a very logical explanation for this. Since the start of the year, I’ve been using an RSS reader. Every day, it magically aggregates all the new stories and video clips and articles from the websites I subscribe to into one, easy to browse location. It’s great. I’ve read and watched and heard about things I never knew about, much less knew could be interesting. Unfortunately, I spend too much time reading and curating to write about much else.

 

I browse subscribe to far more websites than I really can handle. I currently have over 200 subscriptions on my feed and receive more than 500 articles a day. For a while, I made a valiant attempt to read everything in my subscription inbox every day. Come home from work, turn on the computer, read the news, eat dinner, read the news while eating dinner, do dishes, read more news. Easily 2 to 3 hours every evening. In the meantime, the rest of my life began to fray. Things like cleaning. Socializing. Working. Praying. Hygiene (-ing?). (OMG, just kidding!). Sure, I was entertained and informed and distracted by shiny objects, but it was having a pretty deleterious effect on what some might call “real life”.

 

I was drowning in information. Literally. And in my attempt to stay afloat, to stay ahead of the torrent that was crashing down atop my head, there were disconcerting changes in the nature of my efforts. There was less reading. More skimming. More blatant disregard for opinions that “weren’t worth my time”. Nuance was lost. Context disregarded. Primary sources ignored. Arguments dis/agreed with, not analyzed. TL:DR. I could feel the echo chamber starting to ring, despite the fact that I subscribed to blogs with a wide-ish range of perspectives.

 

Thankfully, one week I went to a conference, my inbox exploded, and I never managed to catch back up. I actively follow about 4 (non-friend) websites now, about the same number as before I started using an RSS reader. Every so often, I’ll work my way through the archives of one or two websites, but I no longer try to read everything all the time. It was unsettling at first, seeing the unread article count climb ever higher. But then it crossed 999+. And it has remained frozen there ever since: a reminder of the breadth and depth of human creativity, knowledge, and experience; a monument to the folly of trying to handle it all at once; and guidepost for when I decide to explore its wonders again.

 


 

Relevant readings:

What I’m reading ed. 100315

Monday, March 15th, 2010

Ooof, this is what happens when you don’t post for 3 weeks. There’s a huge post below the cut, so here’re my top five reads.

    1. Our tax code is a mess (Bartlett)
    2. It’s the economy, stupid
    3. Waterboarding detailed: (caution, some may find this disturbing.)
    4. Iraqi elections reactions from Iraq and the Middle East
    5. Nature vs genetically modified wheat: Wheat stem rust makes a comeback. (Wired)

    And one for fun:  2010 SXSW mp3’s (legal)

    As usual, highlights are in red.

     

    (more…)

    What I’m reading ed. 100221

    Monday, February 22nd, 2010

    I really did try to get this out last week, Livia, really I did. But I didn’t, and now this post has become bloated in size just like all of the others. *sigh*

     

    I didn’t know how to categorize this first link, so I’ll just let it stand alone above the cut.

    • Jens Galschiot’s Survival of the Fattest

      There’s an inscription: “I’m sitting on the back of a man. He is sinking under the burden. I would do anything to help him. Except stepping down from his back.”

     

    (more…)

    What I’m reading ed. 100209

    Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

    The news really doesn’t stop, does it? And I didn’t even touch the Toyota recalls… Does anyone have any interesting topics they think I should read more about? As usual, highlights are in red.

    Politics

    • Bipartisanship at its finest (Fallows)

      I got this note from someone with many decades’ experience in national politics, about a discussion between two Congressmen over details of the stimulus bill:

      “GOP member: ‘I’d like this in the bill.’

      “Dem member response: ‘If we put it in, will you vote for the bill?’

      “GOP member: ‘You know I can’t vote for the bill.’

      “Dem member: ‘Then why should we put it in the bill?’

      “I witnessed this myself.”

    •  

      (more…)

    What I’m reading ed. 100131

    Sunday, January 31st, 2010

    If you haven’t read the State of the Union and the Obama-GOP Q&A, go ahead and read them now.  Otherwise, here’s the news of the past two weeks.  As usual, highlights are in red.

     


     

    Politics

    • Political corruption or political gratitude? Or just politics? (Rauch)

      Consider Rep. Patricia Porker, a member of the Ways and Means Committee. She is running for re-election.

      Consider, next, Marvin Moneybags. He is a wealthy individual with interests before Ways and Means.

      Now consider two scenarios.

      1) Porker calls up Moneybags and says, “Say, Marvin. I need about $300,000 to run campaign ads, but I’m not allowed to take donations that big. I know you’d hate to see anything happen to those tax credits I’ve helped you with. Just a thought: Go spend $300,000 on ads supporting my candidacy. You won’t regret it.”

      2) Moneybags is a friend and an enthusiastic supporter of Porker’s. Acting on his own, without consulting Porker, he spends $300,000 on “Vote for Porker!” ads.

      Why is Scenario 1 illegal and Scenario 2 legal?

    •  

      (more…)