Book Review: Pandora’s Star

February 6th, 2010

100206_pandorasstarPandora’s Star is the first book of Peter Hamilton’s 2-part epic space operatic saga. You may accuse me of making up words, but I assure you, there is no more appropriate term for it. Part 1, Pandora’s star, clocks in at a hefty 988 pages. And these are no light-reading-harry-potter-100-pph pages either. These are Tolkein-esque, chock full of environmental and technological descriptors and unique cultures and characters.

 

To set the stage, the year is 2380. Wormhole gateway technology has led to the colonization of hundreds of interstellar worlds. Biotechnology has also greatly altered society, allowing for bio-electrical implants, implantable memory recorders, and perhaps most importantly, rejuvenation and relife procedures. (They are exactly what they sound like). Society is stable, and our contacts with aliens have been benign. One day, two stars suddenly wink out of existence. Dyson Alpha and Beta. No lead-up, no supernova, nothing. Humans, being the insatiably curious species we are, send out a space ship to investigate. The first in hundreds of years. As you might deduce from the title of the book, what humankind finds there is not pretty.

 

The plot is perhaps not the most inventive of all time, but what makes Pandora’s Star impressive is it scope. Hamilton weaves together what feels like a dozen distinct threads into a central plot (evidently this is common to all his epics). Sure, it makes things complicated, but on the other hand, the multiple settings allow the reader to really be immersed in the world, neigh galaxy, that Hamilton has constructed. Instead of just reading about Wilson Kime jet-setting around in his FTL-spaceship, you get the sense that the unfolding events are of galactic consequence, and that yes, Virginia, mankind is truly in danger. (To make an unfair comparison, and pick on Ms. Rowling again, if Voldemort killed Harry Potter, did you really fear for the fate of the wizarding and human worlds? That said, I did enjoy HP. Really!)

 

To be honest, getting into the book is a bit of a chore. For the first two hundred pages or so, you’re constantly bombarded with new characters, new places, and new insights into the 24th century society. But if you keep reading. Eventually names will start to recur, places become familiar, and plotlines coalesce. Is it worth it? There’s still another book to go, but it’s been a fun ride so far.

What I’m reading ed. 100131

January 31st, 2010

If you haven’t read the State of the Union and the Obama-GOP Q&A, go ahead and read them now.  Otherwise, here’s the news of the past two weeks.  As usual, highlights are in red.

 


 

Politics

  • Political corruption or political gratitude? Or just politics? (Rauch)

    Consider Rep. Patricia Porker, a member of the Ways and Means Committee. She is running for re-election.

    Consider, next, Marvin Moneybags. He is a wealthy individual with interests before Ways and Means.

    Now consider two scenarios.

    1) Porker calls up Moneybags and says, “Say, Marvin. I need about $300,000 to run campaign ads, but I’m not allowed to take donations that big. I know you’d hate to see anything happen to those tax credits I’ve helped you with. Just a thought: Go spend $300,000 on ads supporting my candidacy. You won’t regret it.”

    2) Moneybags is a friend and an enthusiastic supporter of Porker’s. Acting on his own, without consulting Porker, he spends $300,000 on “Vote for Porker!” ads.

    Why is Scenario 1 illegal and Scenario 2 legal?

  •  

    Read the rest of this entry »

Obama & GOP Q&A // State of the Union

January 29th, 2010

I’m back from FL, so hopefully the updates will get moving again.

Meanwhile, the State of the Union was the big political news of the week. It was good (and definitely quelled the general panic in the liberal blog-o-sphere after the MA elections), but I’d say that this Q&A session with the GOP is _infinitely_ more compelling. Granted, its not exactly a fair setting, since Obama always has the last word, but perhaps the Republicans (and the Democrats) will finally learn their lesson: don’t bring talking points to a law professor fight.

 

It’s 90 minutes, so make yourself some hot chocolate, grab a blanket, make yourself comfortable, and turn on your brain. Q&A starts at 19:00, though the opening remarks are worth a listen too. (Video) (Transcript)

 

And in case you missed it, the State of the Union Address (Video) (Transcript)

Frankly, how some of you went after this bill, you would think that this thing was a Bolshevik plot. That’s how you presented it. I’m thinking to myself, how is it that a plan that is pretty centrist — no, look. I’m just saying. I know you guys disagree, but if you look at the facts of this bill, most independent observers would say this is actually what many Republicans — it is similar to what many republicans proposed to Bill Clinton when he was doing his debate on health care.

So, all I’m saying is, we’ve got to close the gap a little bit between the rhetoric and the reality. I’m not suggesting that we’re going to agree on everything, whether it’s on health care, energy or what have you. But if the way these issues are being presented by the Republicans is that this is some wild-eyed plot to impose huge government in every aspect of our lives, what happens is you guys then don’t have a lot of room to negotiate with me.

 

Your (dys) functional government: 177 appointments on hold

January 21st, 2010

 

Mainstream media is going nuts over the election of Scott Brown over Martha Coakley and what that means for health care reform and Obama’s agenda and blah blah blah. While I’ll agree that this probably doesn’t bode well for having Congress accomplish anything important in the foreseeable future, they seem to be missing the point:

 

Why has “government” become an arena for our two political parties to posture and preen and strut and vie for power instead of a place where, y’know, actual governing takes place.

 

*ahem* They seem to be missing the point as well as contributing to the problem.

 

Read this: 177 out of 631 political appointments still unconfirmed

 

(for comparison, Bush II had 70 unconfirmed appointees after 1 year)

 

Ugh, the fact that political parties(y) and special interests are playing games with our government sickens me.

 

What kind of games? I’ve already showed you that the filibuster game has experienced a dramatic increase in popularity lately, so let’s look at another game. A game called “let’s not appoint government officials and then blame government for not working”

 

It might have been useful, perhaps to have a someone in charge of the TSA in the aftermath of the Christmas terrorist attempt. Having someone in a position like that might have even helped to say, thwart the attack. (Ok, probably not, but let me stand on my soapbox here.) What? You say that there is a position like that? And that someone highly qualified has been appointed? And that a vote on his nomination has been put off for 4 months?!?! (Southers has since withdrawn his nomination)

 

You would figure that in this terrible economy it might be important to have a full complement of assistant secretaries at the Treasury Department. Clearly, not everyone thinks that, since 4 out of 10 are still awaiting confirmation. (Though, to be fair, Obama, what took you so long to nominate them?)

 

You might also think that maintaining strong diplomatic relationships with Brazil, only the largest economy in South America, the 8th largest country in the world, and one of the the four fast-growing BRIC countries, would be well-advised. Unless, of course, you were an American Congressman and decided to ice the nominee for over seven months.

 

I’ll be upfront and say that I can’t comment on the quality of the nominees. There could very well be a legitimate concerns (I’m looking at you, Harriet Myers.) However, don’t pull crap like this and expect me to give you the benefit of the doubt in the future.

 

The most absurd hold of 2009, perhaps, was on Miriam Sapiro, whom the Obama administration appointed to become a U.S. trade representative. Sen. Jim Bunning, a Republican from Kentucky, held up the respected Internet policy specialist’s nomination over — really — candy-flavored cigarettes. Big Tobacco, with Bunning on its side, wanted the Obama administration to lobby against Canada’s banning of flavored cigarettes like cloves, which are particularly popular among underage smokers. According to the New York Times, Bunning lifted the hold only when Democrats agreed to put a Republican, Michael Khouri, on the Federal Maritime Commission. (In the end, Bunning didn’t even attend the vote that confirmed Sapiro.)

 

Ok. I’ll step off the soapbox now.

 

Partial list of held appointments below the cut.

 

The full list @ whitehouse.gov
This post brought to you by Foreign Policy Ezra Klein and Matt Yglesias

 

Read the rest of this entry »

Midweek Plug: Haiti donation pledge drive (updated!)

January 21st, 2010

So it’s been about a month since the last midweek plug, but I’m really excited about this one.

One of my good friends Livia (and her husband and her mom) is pledging to donate $10 $20 for every person who donates to an organization working in Haiti and leaves a comment on her blog.


blog.liviablackburne.com

Here’s how it will work.

1. Please make a donation to Haiti relief efforts. You can donate to the American Red Cross by texting “HAITI” to 90999 (A $10 donation will be taken off your phone bill). Or, make a donation via their web page* or another charity of choice.

2. Leave a comment in this post noting that you made a donation. My husband and I will donate $10 to the American Red Cross for every donation listed in the comment section between now and the end of Thursday, up to a limit of $500 dollars.

We’re just going to go by the honor system here. Please do consider making a donation. Thank you!

Livia – neuroscientist/writer by day; philanthropist by night; all-around-awesome all-the-freaking-time.


A general guideline: Mark your donations for the general fund, not the Haiti fund. High profile disasters tend to pull in more money than they need (there are still a few billion dollars unspent from the tsunami), so general fund donations give the organizations the flexibility to put your money to the best use.

Advice on giving (from various development blogs): 1, 2, 3, 4

Ashes to ashes, bytes to bytes

January 20th, 2010

 

One of the unexpected pleasures of going home for Christmas was going through my dad’s boxes boxes upon boxes of old files. There was almost nothing of sentimental value, just portfolios for projects long past. Still, it was fascinating to scan through the reams of paper. Scraps of handwritten notes, names of coworkers that I barely recognized, the places where my father went for business. The barest of glimpses into the life my father had outside of the home.

 

I saved a folio for myself, a momento of the work my father poured his life into, but which I never really understood. The rest of the files are marked to be shredded; after all, what purpose do they now serve? If I really want to be reminded of my father’s legacy, I need merely look in the mirror.

 


 

Changing gears a bit, digging through my father’s boxes made me a little bit sad about the transition to the digital age. My father had saved hundreds (thousands?) of work files. Mostly computer printouts, but they were at least physical and tactile and you could skim through the odd page or three. Me? I will leave behind hundreds (thousands?) of gigabytes of data, which frankly, makes for a much less enjoyable sorting experience.

 

I would also be sorely remiss to not mention that my father’s legacy includes (and perhaps more importantly, includes) the rest of my immediate family and his family and friends. It just makes for terribly clunky writing that I am not quite good enough to de-clunkify.

 

PSA: Swing Dance @ Northwestern on Jan 24

January 18th, 2010

For those of you in the Chi-town area. I won’t be there ( D= ), but it’ll be awesome as usual

 


 

Swing Dance – Live music ft. Shout Section Big Band
Jan 24, 2009
8-11pm in the Louis Room (Norris)
FREE BEGINNER LESSON at 7pm
sponsored by the NU Swing Dance Syndicate
$5 for Wildcard holders/$7 general admission

 

Come dust off your dancing shoes with Shout Section Big Band and the NU Swing Dance Syndicate. It’ll be cold outside, but the dancing will be hot! Plus, this is the one and only dance before our Valentine’s Day dance, just in case you need to brush up on a few moves to impress a certain someone… Drinks and refreshments will be provided. Beginners are welcome!

 

What I’m reading ed. 100116

January 16th, 2010

Way too much happens over the course of two weeks. It took me 2 hrs just to take all the links and clippings and format them >.< . But for now, here’s the news. Again, highlights are in red.

 


 

Haiti

  • Estimated death toll: 50,000 + rising. To put this into perspective, the 2004 tragic tsunami killed ~250,000 people in Indonesia (pop 240M), or about 1 in 1,000. Haiti has a population of 10M, meaning the earthquake killed about 1 in 200 (and possibly up to 1 in 50 (!))
  • Updates from TheLede (NYT): Day 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
  • Advice on giving (from various development blogs): 1, 2, 3, 4
  • Photos from Haiti

 

Read the rest of this entry »

In which I vainly attempt to be a food blogger…

January 13th, 2010

Over the Christmas break, I went to my first certifiably fancy-shmancy restaurant in Chicago, Spring, home of Chef Shawn McClain, James Beard Winner 2006.

 

100112spring

 

Generally not the sort of place I dine at, but my good friend wyu was in town and I had a Groupon to burn. I suppose it wouldn’t hurt to do do grown up things every once in a while, yah?

 

Read the rest of this entry »

The not quite New Year’s post

January 9th, 2010

New Year’s Eve/Day is a funny thing. While I’ll gladly take any excuse to take a day off and party, it strikes me as slightly amusing that we’re essentially celebrating an arbitrary marker of the fact that we’ve managed to make it one more year without destroying human civilization. Hmm…I wonder how many people are celebrating the events of the past year, and how many people are celebrating the hope of having a fresh start.

 

At any rate, now that it’s 9 days after 2009, (um…just…like…I…planned?) here’s a quick look back on 2009 and a quick look forward to 2010.

 

9 things I will remember about 2009

  • Death
  • Grace
  • Obama
  • Weddings
  • Economic collapse
  • Iran
  • Healthcare
  • Political dysfunction
  • Michael Jackson

 

0 things that I will look forward to in 2010

 

And that’s a wrap!

 


 

Some more professional looks at the past year

  • Time’s photographs of the year
  • The decade for the world (NYT)
  • 2009 in one wordle (NPR)
  • And, NYT’s awesome decade recap.